Former Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang Set to Testify to Congress

Jensen Huang has resigned as chief executive of Nvidia and is scheduled to appear before Congress after acknowledging an affair with a woman whom US investigators have linked to Chinese intelligence, according to an Al Jazeera Inside Story episode published Nov. 13, 2026. The Federal Bureau of Investigation and the Department of Justice have opened separate inquiries, the broadcast reported, though neither agency has filed public charges tied to the matter in the material reviewed.

The resignation marks a rare moment for a company whose chips sit at the center of the global artificial-intelligence buildout. Nvidia told Al Jazeera that no company data has been compromised and that it has found no breach of national security tied to Huang's conduct. That claim has not been independently verified by outside investigators, and the program's panel discussion treated it as unconfirmed pending the FBI and Justice Department reviews.

What is under federal investigation?

The FBI and Justice Department inquiries center on the nature of Huang's relationship with a woman described in the broadcast as having alleged ties to Chinese intelligence services. The report did not specify charges, a timeline for either investigation, or whether Huang is a subject or a witness. Paulo Carvao, a research fellow at the Harvard Kennedy School who specializes in AI and technology policy, joined the panel to assess the policy stakes; the available transcript did not include a direct quote from him on the probe's specifics.

The uncertainty is itself part of the story. Nvidia's denial of any security breach and the opening of two federal investigations are not mutually exclusive — a company can report no technical intrusion while investigators still examine whether an executive's personal conduct created exposure. The program, hosted by Per Nyberg, framed the matter as unresolved, posing the question of how the United States will handle potential spying at the top of one of the world's most valuable companies without supplying an answer.

What does Nvidia say about data and security?

According to the broadcast, Nvidia's position is twofold: no company data was compromised, and no national-security breach occurred. The available report did not detail what internal review produced that conclusion or whether it was conducted independently of the ongoing federal inquiries. That gap is the central uncertainty facing lawmakers who will question Huang directly.

Could this affect US chipmaking?

Al Jazeera's panel raised, as an open question rather than a settled finding, whether the episode could damage the US chip-manufacturing sector. Aya Ibrahim, senior fellow for economic and national security at the AI Now Institute, and Einar Tangen, senior fellow at the Centre for International Governance Innovation and a specialist in China-US relations, were brought on specifically to weigh that risk from economic-security and geopolitical angles, respectively. The report did not include projections of financial impact, market-share shifts, or specific national-security remediation steps — figures that, if they exist, were not disclosed in the source material reviewed for this story.

What happens when Huang testifies?

No hearing date was given in the material reviewed, but the broadcast confirms Huang is due to appear before Congress. Lawmakers are expected to press him on the scope of his relationship with the woman named in the federal inquiries, on what he disclosed to Nvidia's board before resigning, and on whether export-controlled technology or research data figured into the relationship in any way. None of those specifics were addressed in the Inside Story segment available to HTT News.

What is confirmed, and what is not?

• Confirmed: Huang resigned as Nvidia CEO; two federal agencies — the FBI and the Department of Justice — have opened investigations; Huang is scheduled to testify before Congress.
• Not yet confirmed: Nvidia's claim of no data compromise and no security breach has not been corroborated by an independent finding in the material reviewed; no hearing date, charges, or financial-impact estimate has been published.

The method by which Congress, the FBI and the Justice Department resolve those open questions — subpoenaed records, closed-door briefings, or public testimony — will determine whether the episode remains a contained personnel matter or becomes a broader test of oversight over AI-sector supply chains. Until investigators or lawmakers release findings, the available reporting supports the sequence of events, not a verdict on what, if anything, was compromised.