politics
Why Did Trump Target Mary Peltola Before Alaska's Vote?

Mary Peltola, the Alaska Native Democrat whom polls favor to win her state's open Senate seat, faced a Justice Department lawsuit, a presidential demand for her prosecution, and a governor-ordered investigation in the days before Alaskans cast their ballots, according to an opinion piece published by the Guardian on Nov. 2, 2026.
What did the Justice Department ask a judge to do?
At Donald Trump's direction, the department sued last week to block certification of Alaska's Senate race in the event the Republican incumbent, Dan Sullivan, narrowly loses, the Guardian reports. The suit sought to intervene before a single vote had been counted.
Why did a judge dismiss the lawsuit?
A federal judge dismissed the department's suit on Sunday, Nov. 1, 2026, per the Guardian. The administration said it planned to appeal the ruling.
What did Trump say about Peltola, and what followed?
On Wednesday, Oct. 28, 2026, Trump demanded Peltola be removed from the ballot and prosecuted, according to the Guardian piece. Alaska's Republican governor has since ordered an investigation into her campaign.
"What's different in Alaska is not the tactic. It's that the federal government has decided to police it in one race." — Petala Ironcloud, the Guardian, Nov. 2, 2026
Is recruiting a second candidate to split votes illegal in Alaska?
A New York Times investigation, cited by the Guardian, reported that operatives working with Peltola's campaign helped recruit a second candidate — also named Sullivan, a retired teacher from Petersburg — to draw votes away from the incumbent. Peltola and her campaign deny this. The Alaska supreme court declined to remove the second Sullivan from the ballot, which the Guardian piece describes as making the tactic "generally legal" in the state.
How common are spoiler-candidate pushes in other 2026 races?
Two figures frame the comparison, both sourced to the Guardian's Nov. 2, 2026 piece:
- In Ohio, Republicans have spent more than $1.58 million boosting progressive candidate Gregory Levy, even as Democrat-aligned groups promote Libertarian Bill Redpath — a mirror-image spoiler strategy playing out in the same election cycle.
- In 2020, Trump allies placed Kanye West on ballots in Vermont, Arkansas and Wisconsin; in 2024, allies worked to add Jill Stein and Cornel West to swing-state ballots. Trump praised both from a rally stage because each candidate "takes 100%" from Democrats, per the remark quoted in the Guardian piece.
No federal lawyer intervened in any of those prior cases, the Guardian notes — the contrast the piece uses to frame the Alaska lawsuit as an outlier in enforcement, not in tactics.
What should voters watch before and after Alaska's count?
- Whether the Justice Department's appeal of the dismissed lawsuit advances before polls close.
- Whether the governor-ordered investigation into Peltola's campaign produces findings before certification.
- Whether the second Sullivan draws enough votes to change the margin between Peltola and incumbent Dan Sullivan.
- Whether similar federal intervention follows in Ohio's Levy-Redpath contest or Iowa's comparable dynamic, both referenced in the Guardian's reporting.
For the full argument and additional race-by-race detail, read the original Guardian opinion piece.
Questions
Is it legal to recruit a spoiler candidate in Alaska?
Yes, according to the Guardian's Nov. 2, 2026 opinion piece — Alaska's supreme court refused to remove the second Sullivan candidate from the ballot, making the tactic generally legal under state law.
What happened to the DOJ's lawsuit over Alaska's Senate race?
A federal judge dismissed the lawsuit on Sunday, Nov. 1, 2026, though the Trump administration said it planned to appeal, per the Guardian.